Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Preferences redesign #8774

Closed
ampinsk opened this issue Dec 9, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #8813
Closed

Preferences redesign #8774

ampinsk opened this issue Dec 9, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #8813
Assignees

Comments

@ampinsk
Copy link
Contributor

ampinsk commented Dec 9, 2019

Since we decided to add the new preference in #7746, we realized we're running out of room in our current preferences dialog. To accommodate this new preference and future new ones, we've decided to redesign the navigation and rearrange some tabs.

We noted this incorporated three big changes, not including the new stashing preference:

  1. New side navigation
  2. Move integration preferences to its own new tab
  3. Reword the confirmation dialog preferences for less redundancy

Here are all the future tab states:

Accounts

Accounts@2x

Integrations

Integrations@2x

Git Config

Git@2x

Appearance

Appearance@2x

Advanced

Advanced@2x

This tab is where the new stashing preference will live.

cc @kuychaco

@Rexogamer
Copy link
Contributor

Somewhat unrelated, but should we drop the beta tag off dark mode? Apart from a few minor issues, it’s mostly finished.

@kuychaco kuychaco added this to Backlog (unprioritized) in Desktop 2.3 release via automation Dec 18, 2019
@kuychaco kuychaco self-assigned this Dec 18, 2019
@kuychaco kuychaco moved this from Backlog (unprioritized) to In Progress Issues in Desktop 2.3 release Dec 18, 2019
Desktop 2.3 release automation moved this from In Progress Issues to Done! Jan 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants
@kuychaco @ampinsk @Rexogamer and others