You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a method to combat spam, DR currently hides post from feed if it gets 2 downvotes as "offensive/spam", A good method indeed, but if we could increase that threshold a little higher, that would be great.
I have seen posts with -1 votes at one point, later having 16 points. That means, if the initial people who see it don't agree to post and downvote it as "offensive/spam" (they shouldn't), Then it will be hidden and no one will be able to see the post. That would be unfair and is apparently a form of "censorship" with control in the hands of initial viewers.
That's why we should increase the Downvote Threshold a bit more, and then it would be better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As a method to combat spam, DR currently hides post from feed if it gets 2 downvotes as "offensive/spam", A good method indeed, but if we could increase that threshold a little higher, that would be great.
I have seen posts with -1 votes at one point, later having 16 points. That means, if the initial people who see it don't agree to post and downvote it as "offensive/spam" (they shouldn't), Then it will be hidden and no one will be able to see the post. That would be unfair and is apparently a form of "censorship" with control in the hands of initial viewers.
That's why we should increase the Downvote Threshold a bit more, and then it would be better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: