Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Discussion]: Can we leverage WASM to improve the image tool? #60

Open
dlford opened this issue Oct 11, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

[Discussion]: Can we leverage WASM to improve the image tool? #60

dlford opened this issue Oct 11, 2022 · 6 comments
Labels
discussion Open discussion, commentary welcome exploring Deciding how best to solve this hacktoberfest This is a valid Hacktoberfest issue help wanted Anyone can pick this up and start working on it

Comments

@dlford
Copy link
Member

dlford commented Oct 11, 2022

I think we can, but I'm not entirely sure, hoping someone with more experience in WASM than myself can chime in.

@dlford dlford added help wanted Anyone can pick this up and start working on it exploring Deciding how best to solve this discussion Open discussion, commentary welcome labels Oct 11, 2022
@gaston-flores
Copy link
Contributor

You definitely can. There is a WASM port of ImageMagick available, and libsquoosh which powers squoosh.app. Squoosh has good support for AVIF #44 😉

@gaston-flores
Copy link
Contributor

Ouch, about Squoosh, it seems web support is not quite there yet 😢 GoogleChromeLabs/squoosh#1084

@dlford
Copy link
Member Author

dlford commented Oct 11, 2022

@gaston-flores fantastic! No worries about Squoosh, looks like ImageMagick supports avif, so I would presume the WASM port does as well 🤞

@dlford
Copy link
Member Author

dlford commented Oct 11, 2022

Ah, just kidding, no avif - https://cancerberosgx.github.io/demos/WASM-ImageMagick/supported-formats/

@gaston-flores
Copy link
Contributor

Damn 😂 Sharp is also working on WASM support here lovell/sharp#3336, so maybe we just need to wait 🤞

@dlford
Copy link
Member Author

dlford commented Oct 12, 2022

@gaston-flores I think you're right, it's just not out there yet, I'll keep this open in the mean time though. Thanks for the info!

@dlford dlford added hacktoberfest This is a valid Hacktoberfest issue and removed hacktoberfest This is a valid Hacktoberfest issue labels Nov 6, 2022
@dlford dlford added the hacktoberfest This is a valid Hacktoberfest issue label Oct 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion Open discussion, commentary welcome exploring Deciding how best to solve this hacktoberfest This is a valid Hacktoberfest issue help wanted Anyone can pick this up and start working on it
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants