Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Miners says offline. Eth 1.0 #197

Open
Carmpan opened this issue Apr 9, 2021 · 21 comments
Open

Miners says offline. Eth 1.0 #197

Carmpan opened this issue Apr 9, 2021 · 21 comments

Comments

@Carmpan
Copy link

Carmpan commented Apr 9, 2021

What's going on? 2 seperate Workers are offline and replaced by one online worker that says ETH 1.0

50% of hashrate is gone.

@iga2iga
Copy link

iga2iga commented Apr 9, 2021

Same with 2070s + 5700xt, back to 2.49

@msvming
Copy link

msvming commented Apr 9, 2021

Same issue observed, my worker name become eth1.0 and show only one worker

@DeeDeeRanged
Copy link

Noticed it too with my gtx 1070 but after stopping gminer and adding --worker gtx1070 its reporting the gtx1070 again. Reported 26.5 MH/s Current Hashrate 14.4 MH/s. I'll let it run now and keep an eye on the current hashrate.

@Carmpan
Copy link
Author

Carmpan commented Apr 9, 2021

So correct configuration would be --worker gtx3090.workername for account mining? Weird

@Carmpan
Copy link
Author

Carmpan commented Apr 9, 2021

From my understanding this may be a regression introduced by the new arg "--worker" that is not correctly sending the worker name to the pool. Consequence is that all rigs are reporting with the default name "eth1.0". The pool dashboard will react as if a new rig named "eth1.0" was added and mark the existing rigs as offline. Since reported hashrate is sent on found share the shown values will be useless. Pools don't use the software reported hashrate, instead they count how many valid shares are sent for a given period to calculare the real hashrate. From what I see there was no drop reported on number of shares so that means no loss of profit.

Well the thing is if you have multiple worker names. The total hashrate displayed is only
From one worker. The others don't count.

@DeeDeeRanged
Copy link

After almost 1.30 hrs Reported HM/s 26.4 Current 26.7 MH/s on Ethermine dashboard. Sofar so good.

@Carmpan
Copy link
Author

Carmpan commented Apr 9, 2021

Seriously. What you say is incorrect. I have 2 miners. Only one worker name shows up ETH 1.0 and the total submitted shares or hashrate is based on one worker. Speed of 1 card only.

I am done. This is not a good software end off.

@DeeDeeRanged
Copy link

DeeDeeRanged commented Apr 9, 2021

This is my line:
gminer-2.50/miner -a ethash --opencl 0 --oc 3 --ssl 1 -s eu1.ethermine.org:5555 -u xxxwalletxxx.gtx1070 --worker gtx1070 --electricity_costs 0.0703

If anyone has some suggestion how to improve the hashrate of my KFA2/GALAX GTX 1070 EXOC SNIPER I am all ears ;)

@msvming
Copy link

msvming commented Apr 9, 2021

my interim solution is adding --worker to assign name instead of using normal syntax, work well so far.

@pdieppa
Copy link

pdieppa commented Apr 9, 2021

I have seen this issue too. I'm currently mining on Digipools and all rigs running 2.50 are not sending the worker name. It shows as 0 for the name. Now, the Hashrate is correct, it is adding all 7 rigs running Gminer and reporting separately the rigs running Teamredminer. Since I switched to Gminer 2.50, the --worker works with viaBTC, Nicehash and Herominers.

@DeeDeeRanged
Copy link

DeeDeeRanged commented Apr 9, 2021

I removed --worker and eth1.0 is back so I went back to:
gminer-2.50/miner -a ethash --opencl 0 --oc 3 --ssl 1 -s eu1.ethermine.org:5555 -u xxxwalletxxx.gtx1070 --worker gtx1070 --electricity_costs 0.0703r and it does now report my worker as gtx1070. Can confirm you need --worker set to have your rigs reporting like they were.

@develsoftware
Copy link
Owner

Please take look to 2.51 beta, it solves bug with worker name
https://github.com/develsoftware/GMinerBetaRelease/releases/tag/2.51

@pdieppa
Copy link

pdieppa commented Apr 9, 2021

I just installed the latest update for HiveOs which includes Gminer 2.50, reboot all the rigs and now all the workers are showing up at Digipools.

@DeeDeeRanged
Copy link

Please take look to 2.51 beta, it solves bug with worker name
https://github.com/develsoftware/GMinerBetaRelease/releases/tag/2.51

Running it now. Will update findings later.

@DeeDeeRanged
Copy link

Have been running gminer 2.51 beta for almost 4 hrs and sofar I haven't encountered any issues sofar. For me it is working fine. Only quest I have left to do is finding a way to get my GTX 1070 doing a higher hashrate but I am not holding my breath as it has Micron vram.

@dedizones
Copy link

2.51 working for me on ezilme (ETH+ZIL)

i 'm remove -worker %workername% no problem, all rig detected in pool

@a7dfj8aerj
Copy link

I also have the workername bug on version 2.50 and on 2.49 there was power efficiency bug these small bugs are an issue if seen at every version

@dedizones
Copy link

I also have the workername bug on version 2.50 and on 2.49 there was power efficiency bug these small bugs are an issue if seen at every version

for nvidia serie 3xxx - ETH+ZIL / 2.51.

--safe_dag 2
--report_interval 3600
--watchdog 0
--cache_dag 1
--share_check 1
--pec 0
--opencl 0
--kernel 0

@DeeDeeRanged
Copy link

I also have the workername bug on version 2.50 and on 2.49 there was power efficiency bug these small bugs are an issue if seen at every version

Download the 2.51 beta this has resolved the eth1.0 bug and some others.

@DeeDeeRanged
Copy link

DeeDeeRanged commented Apr 10, 2021

Since I also have updated my vbios for my GTX 1070 and the gminer 2.51 beta I see now Reported Hashrate 26.2 MH/s and current Hashrate 35.6 MH/s no stales.
Never got it this high.

@DeeDeeRanged
Copy link

As the issue eth1.0 seems to be resolved I suggest the OP closes this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants