Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use the type passed in DB functions instead of the generic inferred type #38

Closed
MP0w opened this issue Apr 20, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Use the type passed in DB functions instead of the generic inferred type #38

MP0w opened this issue Apr 20, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
discussion low-priority

Comments

@MP0w
Copy link
Member

MP0w commented Apr 20, 2016

... to prevent the same bug we had for cell registration. Not sure if it can happen here... maybe if you assign to a variable with a downcast
@MP0w
Copy link
Member Author

MP0w commented Apr 30, 2016

@joanromano what do think?

@MP0w MP0w added this to the Beta-1 milestone May 1, 2016
@MP0w MP0w removed this from the Beta-1 milestone Jun 12, 2016
@MP0w
Copy link
Member Author

MP0w commented Jun 12, 2016

no need to do it for this case since the user won't pass an instance but a class directly

@MP0w MP0w closed this as completed Jun 12, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
discussion low-priority
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@MP0w