-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixing error in integrated term #56
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I worked through the algebra, and there was definitely a mistake in my computations (probably in a Mathematica notebook which I can't access right now since my license just expired). I now agree with your equations (C37) and (C38), and it's reassuring that these make more sense based on the symmetry of the equations. Sorry about the error, and I hope it didn't waste too much of your time. Have you tried out the new diagonal term? At some point I would like to take the Fourier transform of the complex kernel to check that it agrees (although it must!).
One thing that might be good would be to change the C1
and C2
in the lines below to match the definition in the paper:
Nice work!
-Eric
Thanks! It was no problem - just wanted to make sure that I hadn't missed something. I've updated those lines so that they are consistent with the document now. Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great, thanks!
@ericagol: there was a missing
cosh
in the derivation of the integrated term fortau < Delta
in the manuscript (it was right in the code!), but I found it when deriving the correction for the diagonal of the celerite matrix (which hadn't been implemented correctly before).