You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
is a great overview of quadtrees. But it basically assumes binary values.
The author talks about operations like union and intersection. That'd be cool to implement, but it makes much more sense for binary values than it does for continuous values.
There's a lot of functionality in that paper like this that would be nice to include, but a lot of it makes way more sense with binary values, and that hasn't been my focus. So maybe I should try to provide more support for binary-valued quadtrees?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dfriend21
changed the title
More support for binary quadtrees (i.e. set operations)
More support for binary quadtrees (in particular, set operations)
Oct 7, 2021
Much of the literature I've come across on quadtrees makes the assumption that the values are binary. This article:
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.299.334&rep=rep1&type=pdf
is a great overview of quadtrees. But it basically assumes binary values.
The author talks about operations like union and intersection. That'd be cool to implement, but it makes much more sense for binary values than it does for continuous values.
There's a lot of functionality in that paper like this that would be nice to include, but a lot of it makes way more sense with binary values, and that hasn't been my focus. So maybe I should try to provide more support for binary-valued quadtrees?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: