You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not entirely sure if you should care about such years but I noticed while playing around that {parttime} doesn't always correctly parse/format ISO 8601 years less than zero or greater than 9999
According to Wikipedia years less than zero or greater than 9999 should be at least four digits wide and prependend with either a "+" or a "-" e.g.
+12345
-12345
-0004
I do observe that negative numbers strictly less than -999 seem to be formatted correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just documenting another artifact of this behavior, printing of negative parttime years uses the - as part of the four digits. Not strictly incorrect, but makes it harder to round-trip the data as a string:
Not entirely sure if you should care about such years but I noticed while playing around that
{parttime}
doesn't always correctly parse/format ISO 8601 years less than zero or greater than 9999According to Wikipedia years less than zero or greater than 9999 should be at least four digits wide and prependend with either a "+" or a "-" e.g.
I do observe that negative numbers strictly less than
-999
seem to be formatted correctly.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: