You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to the paper (section 2.2), constituent word representations are taken to be the average of token representations of the phrase (non-terminal) tokens.
The code actually does a batch matrix multiplication, and therefore achieves the sum of hidden token representations. This may affects both the magnitude and the direction of the phrase level representation after applying the activation.
Am I missing something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
According to the paper (section 2.2), constituent word representations are taken to be the average of token representations of the phrase (non-terminal) tokens.
The code actually does a batch matrix multiplication, and therefore achieves the sum of hidden token representations. This may affects both the magnitude and the direction of the phrase level representation after applying the activation.
Am I missing something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: