You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Can the browsable lists in the search screen be sorted alphabetically instead of by ASCII value? The present method makes them case-sensitive so there are two alphabetical series, sometimes with duplication between capitals and lower-case (eg Gothica and gothica in Notation, or Organ book and organ book in Source Types. If these can be interfiled then it would improve searchability.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The duplicated entries will be sorted out as we go through the data. I believe the idea is that they will be normalized to a specific form, which will take care of the sorting issue. This issue can be used to track progress on this front.
Can the browsable lists in the search screen be sorted alphabetically instead of by ASCII value? The present method makes them case-sensitive so there are two alphabetical series, sometimes with duplication between capitals and lower-case (eg Gothica and gothica in Notation, or Organ book and organ book in Source Types. If these can be interfiled then it would improve searchability.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: