Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WAT does not work with Ritter or UMBC in ERec experiments #207

Closed
MichaelRoeder opened this issue Aug 10, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

WAT does not work with Ritter or UMBC in ERec experiments #207

MichaelRoeder opened this issue Aug 10, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@MichaelRoeder
Copy link
Member

When starting an experiment with "Entity Recognition" and "Strong Annotation Match" choosing WAT and Ritter or UMBC, the WAT annotator returns a lot of HTTP 500 errors.

2017-08-10 17:08:19,933 [pool-5-thread-9] ERROR [org.aksw.gerbil.http.AbstractHttpRequestEmitter] - <Response has the wrong status: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error>
2017-08-10 17:08:19,933 [pool-5-thread-9] ERROR [org.aksw.gerbil.http.AbstractHttpRequestEmitter] - <Response has the wrong status: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error>
2017-08-10 17:08:19,933 [pool-5-thread-9] ERROR [org.aksw.gerbil.annotator.decorator.ErrorCountingAnnotatorDecorator] - <Got an Exception from the annotator (WAT): Response has the wrong status: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error>
2017-08-10 17:08:19,933 [pool-5-thread-9] ERROR [org.aksw.gerbil.annotator.decorator.ErrorCountingAnnotatorDecorator] - <Got an Exception from the annotator (WAT): Response has the wrong status: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error>

http://gerbil.aksw.org/gerbil/experiment?id=201708100001

At the same time, the same experiment has been executed but with the OKE 2016 Task 1 example datasets and it was working without any problems: http://gerbil.aksw.org/gerbil/experiment?id=201708100002

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants