Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NotSupportedError at feedback filter #2273

Closed
MizukiTemma opened this issue May 11, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2324
Closed

NotSupportedError at feedback filter #2273

MizukiTemma opened this issue May 11, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2324
Assignees
Labels
🐛 bug Something isn't working ❗ prio: medium Should be scheduled in the forseeable future. ☺️ effort: low Should be doable in <4h
Milestone

Comments

@MizukiTemma
Copy link
Member

MizukiTemma commented May 11, 2023

Describe the Bug

In some combinations of status and rating choices, an error occurs when filter is applied for feedback list.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Go to the global or a region feedback
  2. Uncheck "unread" and "positive"
  3. Apply filter
  4. See NotSupportedError (Calling QuerySet.select_related() after union() is not supported)

Expected Behavior

Filter result will be shown.

Actual Behavior

Error occurs.

Additional Information

The same promlem can exist in filters for other contents.
Other but similar problems can exist too.

Traceback
@MizukiTemma MizukiTemma added the 🐛 bug Something isn't working label May 11, 2023
@timobrembeck timobrembeck added this to the 23Q2 milestone May 11, 2023
@timobrembeck timobrembeck added ❗ prio: medium Should be scheduled in the forseeable future. ☺️ effort: low Should be doable in <4h labels Jun 20, 2023
@MizukiTemma MizukiTemma self-assigned this Jun 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🐛 bug Something isn't working ❗ prio: medium Should be scheduled in the forseeable future. ☺️ effort: low Should be doable in <4h
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants