Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug(?): Alphabetical sorting prevents re-ordering of sections but does not itself actually sort the sections alphabetically #178

Open
m0bilebtw opened this issue Dec 30, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@m0bilebtw
Copy link

Alphabetical sorting option seems to only sort the setups within a section, while not changing the order of the sections at all. It seems that it should either:
a) Re-order sections as well, alphabetically, when enabled
or
b) Not prevent manual re-ordering of sections when it is enabled (while still sorting setups alphabetically within each section)
or
c) Have separate options for (Alphabetic sorting of setups) and (Alphabetic sorting of sections)

I prefer option c, but a or b would still be favourable over current behaviour

@dillydill123
Copy link
Owner

I wasn't sure the best option for this since it really seems like preference so I just kept it as is. You can move sections around still. At this point I'd like to avoid having too many buttons and keep the plugin simpler. So I'd probably go with option A if I'm going to sort them.. but it goes back a little to the preference bit 🤷‍♂️

@m0bilebtw
Copy link
Author

You can move sections around still

There's a message box pop-up "Move Failed", "You cannot move this while a sorting mode is enabled." - so I have to disable sorting mode, re-order my sections manually to be how I like (alphabetical or otherwise), then re-enable the sorting mode (even though the sorting mode doesn't affect the sections).

I understand wanting to keep the UI simple and the preference, but would it be possible to remove this limitation on manual re-ordering of sections when automatic sorting of setups is enabled?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants