Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Option to display all roster items in the chat list. #1527

Open
Jieiku opened this issue Dec 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Option to display all roster items in the chat list. #1527

Jieiku opened this issue Dec 25, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@Jieiku
Copy link

Jieiku commented Dec 25, 2023

When a user freshly installs Dino, they are presented with an empty box.

2023-12-25_07-23-02

In pidgin when you login you get a Visible list of contacts from which you can chat with people.

I understand in Dino you can use the plus icon above to open a new chat. For a Very large server this is actually probably a good format.

For a private server where you have 20 or less people, this is actually just extra work to open a chat.

I am suggesting a new option be added to show all available contacts in the chat list, so that all you have to do is click on them and start chatting.

@licaon-kter
Copy link
Contributor

licaon-kter commented Dec 25, 2023

So I'm forced to close 100 1:1 chats and 25 channels? Rather odd...

Also, currently developed clients, like Dino or Conversations etc respect "autojoin" flags so chats opened in other (currently developed) clients will be opened by default in all clients. So not ALL contacts and not all MUCs but only those that you actually have opened elsewhere.

For a new user there's nothing to open anyway, yes?

If Pidgin does not set "autojoin", please report that to its devs (good luck!).

@Jieiku
Copy link
Author

Jieiku commented Dec 28, 2023

It is less about open chats and more about having an OPTIONALLY visible roster in the chat list place instead.

However this request may be moot, I did not realize the systray support request was more than 6 years old.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants