Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't ignore error message on PQ.consumeInput #20

Closed
steve-chavez opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Don't ignore error message on PQ.consumeInput #20

steve-chavez opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@steve-chavez
Copy link

Hey @diogob,

On PostgREST/postgrest#3313 (reply in thread), a user reports the LISTEN channel is getting killed and we're getting a generic error message from hasql-notifications which comes from:

Nothing -> panic "Error checking for PostgreSQL notifications"

There might be more details on PQ.consumeInput, since according to pg docs:

PQconsumeInput normally returns 1 indicating “no error”, but returns 0 if there was some kind of trouble (in which case PQerrorMessage can be consulted).

However PQ.consumeInput result is getting ignored on:

void $ PQ.consumeInput pqCon

@diogob
Copy link
Owner

diogob commented Mar 12, 2024

Hi @steve-chavez , would a panic with some custom message work on your side? I can get the string from PQerrorMessage and default to the generic one when no string is available (comes inside a Maybe).

It could be the case that the call to PQsocket is failing during the connection setup (I think that panic should not be there, perhaps just using a delay will fix the issue).

I'll work on a PR to fix this.

@diogob diogob self-assigned this Mar 12, 2024
@diogob diogob added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 12, 2024
@diogob
Copy link
Owner

diogob commented Mar 12, 2024

@steve-chavez I just put together a quick attempt to address the issue on #21 but haven't tested it. Are you able to use the version from that branch and verify if the behaviour change would satisfy your case?

@diogob
Copy link
Owner

diogob commented Mar 13, 2024

@steve-chavez just published 0.2.1.0

@diogob diogob closed this as completed Mar 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants