Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support arm64 system #54

Open
longquan7 opened this issue Aug 4, 2017 · 8 comments
Open

support arm64 system #54

longquan7 opened this issue Aug 4, 2017 · 8 comments

Comments

@longquan7
Copy link

longquan7 commented Aug 4, 2017

I was modify the Dockerfile the first line in order to support arm64.
Change "From alpine:3.5" to "From aarch64/alpine:3.5" that would support arm64 system. So How to use one Dockerfile to support different syatem than x86 and arm64.

@hrw
Copy link

hrw commented Oct 12, 2017

I can build images on arm64. I can use ansible on arm64. I can not deploy from arm64 to other arm64 because registry image is x86-64 only ;(

@dansta
Copy link

dansta commented Dec 31, 2017

I also want the registry running on arm64 architecture. I am currently trying to build some stuff for raspberry pi at home, and currently the workaround is building the image on all the swarm nodes or using images from dockerhub that are not maintained. Neither are reliable or preferred.

I'm sure I could fork the official registry repository and try to build it on my raspberry pi, but I believe official support would be more appreciated.

And from what I've read the rpi3 runs the Cortex A-53 which is arm 64bit, even though the kernel support is not there yet.

@hrw
Copy link

hrw commented Dec 31, 2017

@dansta rpi3 can run arm64 kernel and userspace for quite long time.

@lag-linaro
Copy link

Any update on this issue?

The PR #74 submitted by @tianon looks to solve ARM64 and would ensure the happiness of quite a few users. 😄

@tianon
Copy link
Contributor

tianon commented Jul 5, 2018 via email

@lag-linaro
Copy link

Is there any reason why moving to Alpine 3.8 wouldn't 'just work'?

@lag-linaro
Copy link

I see other people asking for this now too.

@tianon what is holding this up presently?

We have this repo with your PR applied and it's building/running fine.

To test simply do docker pull laglinaro/distribution-library-image.

@lag-linaro
Copy link

Is there anything I can do to push this along?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment