Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

do not check if HEAD is rebased #643

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 14, 2017
Merged

do not check if HEAD is rebased #643

merged 3 commits into from
May 14, 2017

Conversation

randy3k
Copy link
Collaborator

@randy3k randy3k commented May 2, 2017

It is not necessary to check if HEAD is rebased. Manuplicating commits should be always possible (if there are no merges).

close #619

@stoivo
Copy link
Member

stoivo commented May 5, 2017

I don't really use this part of gitsavvy, so I'm not sure how it should be.

@randy3k
Copy link
Collaborator Author

randy3k commented May 5, 2017

Most of the related code in this PR was written by @divmain, I guess he will be the best one to review this.

@randy3k randy3k requested a review from divmain May 5, 2017 19:51
@divmain
Copy link
Collaborator

divmain commented May 14, 2017

Sorry for the long wait. These changes look mostly cosmetic, and fit in well with well-used parts of the codebase. Merging.

@divmain divmain merged commit db041db into master May 14, 2017
@divmain divmain deleted the randy3k/rebase_check branch May 14, 2017 07:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Squashing two commits should not depend on the base ref
3 participants