You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A Serializer should be defined in a way that is format-specific, instead of representing a "has-many" relationship in one Serializer, the current supported Serializers should be composed of many Serializer objects.
Right now, if I wanted to use two third party Serializers, I need to create some middle-ground object that merges them together. The real need is to be able to treat serializers much like middleware.
A
Serializer
should be defined in a way that is format-specific, instead of representing a "has-many" relationship in one Serializer, the current supported Serializers should be composed of manySerializer
objects.Right now, if I wanted to use two third party Serializers, I need to create some middle-ground object that merges them together. The real need is to be able to treat serializers much like middleware.
If you need to define
Resource
-specific Serializer objects, you should be able to define them as such:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: