Fixed #33163 -- Added example of connection signal handlers in AppConfig.ready() to docs.

[roxanebellot]

See ticket and forum post

I tried to keep as much as existing naming and formulation as I could.

When it is ok with you, I can also do a French translation

[github-actions]

Hello @roxanebellot! Thank you for your contribution 💪

As it's your first contribution be sure to check out the patch review checklist.

If you're fixing a ticket from Trac make sure to set the "Has patch" flag and include a link to this PR in the ticket!

If you have any design or process questions then you can ask in the Django forum.

Welcome aboard ⛵️!

[felixxm]

@roxanebellot Thanks for this patch 👍 I don't think that a separate section is needed. I would add an example to the existing admonition. Please try to avoid unnecessary blank lines.

[roxanebellot]

Hi !

Thank ou for your interest, blank lines are chopped ✔️

Can you confirm that a subsection is unfit compared to using an admonition ? We would loose the benefit of the anchor and maybe legibility too (it would be a big green zone)

Also, i am having doubts about the title "Where should this code live" but if it's ok with you, it's ok with me.

[felixxm]

Can you confirm that a subsection is unfit compared to using an admonition ? We would loose the benefit of the anchor and maybe legibility too (it would be a big green zone)

Yes: "I don't think that a separate section is needed. I would add an example to the existing admonition.". IMO a longer admonition doesn't affect readability.

[felixxm]

@roxanebellot Thanks for updates 👍 Welcome aboard ⛵

I pushed small edits.

[adamchainz]

Thanks @roxanebellot and @felixxm !