Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add an api #16

Closed
twidi opened this issue Jan 12, 2012 · 3 comments · Fixed by #207
Closed

Add an api #16

twidi opened this issue Jan 12, 2012 · 3 comments · Fixed by #207

Comments

@twidi
Copy link

twidi commented Jan 12, 2012

I'm working on the Repos.io site, which allow users to search for and manage repositories, and i would add a backend for django-snippets, which is very usefull.

I could write it myself and add a pull-request but i currently have no time for it (lot of code to do for Repos.io), i just add it as a reminder or if someone has time :)

This api should handle registration (via oauth ?), and at least read access for various objects, and bookmarks (idealy it should allow to add/remove bookmarks)

All of this can be done with piston (never did it but i heard about it)

@zerok
Copy link
Contributor

zerok commented Nov 23, 2013

Personally, I would like to see a read-only API to allow easier integration with external ticket systems etc.

I'm not sure about going all-out and including APIs for the personal parts of the site, though.

@chriswedgwood
Copy link
Collaborator

Is this something we want to do? Would not take that much effort and be good to showcase DRF?

@carltongibson
Copy link
Member

HI @chriswedgwood. Yes... it's something to consider. My hope is that the app is a kind of reference: Look, here's an actual site you can browse and copy from… — so a small simple API — perhaps just read-only, at least at first pass, would be a nice addition.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants