Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Too much invalid shares #23

Open
junforever opened this issue Oct 26, 2017 · 6 comments
Open

Too much invalid shares #23

junforever opened this issue Oct 26, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@junforever
Copy link

Hello can anybody help me with this, according to the miner my accepted shared are 4131/4131 but in the dashboard of my account the invalid number is 47.62% of my shares, why the long difference? which is wrong? If the miner is wrong could you tell me please which are the possible causes of so many rejected percentage please?
I have 3 gpus: gtx 1070 G1 rev1 2 gtx 1080 ti ftw3, my oc settings are: 99 core - 600 mem (1070),  60 core 500 mem(1080), 85 core 500 mem (1080) I am in windows 7 and my driver version of nvidia is 385.69 I am using the ccminer_cuda9.exe Thanks for the help
valid

 

@tinita2085
Copy link

Hi, I have the same issue but with less % of invalid shares, can someone tell us how to fix it. Thanks for your help

@chilak1l
Copy link

chilak1l commented Nov 23, 2017

i try to increase the intensity -i 18 on my 1070s

@UselessGuru
Copy link

I can confirm that this miner produces quite a substantial number of invalid shares (testet with MiningPoolHub).
My cards: 1x GTX 1080ti, 1x GTX 1060 3GB, Driver Version 388.13
DJM34 Lyra2z results in 4.35kH/s, but approx 10% invalid shares
Ccminer 2.2.2 results in 4.2kH/s, but NO invalid shares
OC ist not relevant here.

@djm34
Copy link
Owner

djm34 commented Nov 28, 2017

It is indeed a known problem which was existing in the ccminer version I used to for implementing lyra2z

@tamlin-mike
Copy link

@hapklaar
Copy link

hapklaar commented Dec 31, 2017

Are you going to build a new version without this problem? Like the extra hashrate, but reverted to tpruvot's latest version for now.

@djm34
Copy link
Owner

djm34 commented Dec 31, 2017

no, not for the moment. The stale share considerably reduce the number of valid share (at least on suprnova) and for that reason was remove from that version.
The problem isn't originating from there. Now, you can probably try tpruvot version and see if it produce the same effect or not.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants