-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Illogical water capacity display #11
Comments
Interesting observation, I never checked it, I can reproduce it.
so I just assumed the same formula applies here. To find the correct formula, we probably need to collect a few more datapoints:
@Nitrox912 can you send your hardness in and out values, so I can add them to the table and play around with it? |
I might have found a pattern, still need to fully confirm it: The Now the interesting part is, what's the most useful value for users? Are the values shown on the BWT actual remaining capacities, meaning if they are zero it needs to refresh? If so they would be interesting and I could calculate them from the API values. |
In my system, the hardness in is set to 23 and the hardness out is set to 4. This specification has the highest value to determine how much water each respective column can still soften before it needs to regenerate. I would prefer the value displayed by the BWT device in the integration. However, I have no idea if the values even interest anyone. It was just about traceability for me. |
Thanks, it confirms my assumption. Based on past values from my device I can confirm the BWT shows the amount of water each column can still treat to 0°dH. I start the implementation. For future reference, the formula I came up with is |
I released version v0.5.1 with the new calculated values. Thanks for bringing it up. |
Device: BWT Perla
Version: 2.0209
Hello, I installed the integration a few days ago and noticed some discrepancies in the displayed water capacity in HA compared to the readings on the display of the system. What do the values in the integration mean?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: