Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Interested to use Frontenac? #3

Open
Loupi opened this issue Apr 27, 2013 · 2 comments
Open

Interested to use Frontenac? #3

Loupi opened this issue Apr 27, 2013 · 2 comments

Comments

@Loupi
Copy link

Loupi commented Apr 27, 2013

Hello,

rexpro-client is mentioned in a comment here:
Loupi/Frontenac#1

@dkuppitz
Copy link
Owner

Hi,

RexProClient is made to talk directly to a RexpRo server. How should I use Frontenac?
Also I've looked at the Frontenac source; what I really don't like is the fact, that you're using Java naming conventions instead of C#/.NET naming conventions. It'll look like a mix of C# and Java when you merge Frontenac with any other C# project.

@Loupi
Copy link
Author

Loupi commented Apr 27, 2013

Hello,

What I was wondering is if the equivalent of blueprints-rexster-graph, but using RexPro protocol instead of JSON, could be implemented using both RexProClient and Frontenac.

I understand your dislike of the Java naming conventions in Frontenac. In fact I'm happy to discuss this matter with someone else. At first the project used standard C# naming conventions. Something I would like to do with Frontenac in the future is to port gremlin.

I made some basic proof of concepts to host script engines like Groovy(with IKVM) and IronPython.
What I could not do with them, is to instruct those engines to use a different naming conventions than the real C# objects they are using in the background. I'm not only talking about gremlin queries, but also sample graph creation (TinkerGraph) like the cool ones included in a lot of your posts in the gremlin users mailing list.

It is also possible that I'm going in the wrong direction with all these naming conventions stuff. So please tell me if it is the case. Also, is running existing groovy scripts on top of a .Net graph stack of any value? Maybe yes, maybe not.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants