Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Steinberg VST license #34

Closed
p0nce opened this issue Nov 24, 2013 · 4 comments
Closed

Steinberg VST license #34

p0nce opened this issue Nov 24, 2013 · 4 comments

Comments

@p0nce
Copy link
Contributor

p0nce commented Nov 24, 2013

I've converted the VST 2.4 SDK from Steinberg which include a custom license, available here: http://www.gersic.com/vstsdk/html/plug/intro.html#licence
Should we add a special case for it?

@s-ludwig
Copy link
Member

s-ludwig commented Dec 1, 2013

It looks like it may be difficult to match with other licenses. Especially the paragraphs about disallowing to

  • "license the information contained in this SDK to anyone else."
  • "re-work or otherwise pass this technology off as your own."

and

  • "make sure the end-publisher of your work is also a VST license holder."

may even completely forbid open (source code) distribution, but I'm not a lawyer, so it's basically just guesswork. But to me it looks like it is at least definitely incompatible with GPL style and other shared source licenses.

So unless I'm wrong, the license wouldn't allow anything in terms of combining it with open source licenses that a fully restrictive proprietary license would. As long as that's the case, there is no functional reason to add official support - it would just be regarded as "proprietary".

@p0nce
Copy link
Contributor Author

p0nce commented Dec 1, 2013

It is indeed incompatible with GPL. I'll go with "proprietary" which describe it well.

@p0nce p0nce closed this as completed Dec 1, 2013
@s-ludwig
Copy link
Member

s-ludwig commented Dec 1, 2013

You could use "VST", any unknown license will be treated as "proprietary" by default.

@p0nce
Copy link
Contributor Author

p0nce commented Dec 1, 2013

Did that. Thanks for advice.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants