Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Uncertainty around SUCRA #17

Open
arthur-albuquerque opened this issue Apr 10, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Uncertainty around SUCRA #17

arthur-albuquerque opened this issue Apr 10, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@arthur-albuquerque
Copy link

arthur-albuquerque commented Apr 10, 2022

Hi, if I understood the posterior_ranks() function correctly, SUCRA is only calculated as a point estimate (mean SUCRA):

sucras <- unname((ntrt - rk_summary$mean)/(ntrt - 1))

However, as Triquart et al. have argued, one should consider presenting the uncertainty around the point estimate above:

"SUCRA estimates are not currently presented with their uncertainty intervals. Because SUCRA is derived from the mean rank, the 95% CrI for mean rank should be translated into a 95% CrI for SUCRA"

Would it be possible to add this functionality to the multinma package?

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant