You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
However, as Triquart et al. have argued, one should consider presenting the uncertainty around the point estimate above:
"SUCRA estimates are not currently presented with their uncertainty intervals. Because SUCRA is derived from the mean rank, the 95% CrI for mean rank should be translated into a 95% CrI for SUCRA"
Would it be possible to add this functionality to the multinma package?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, if I understood the posterior_ranks() function correctly, SUCRA is only calculated as a point estimate (mean SUCRA):
sucras <- unname((ntrt - rk_summary$mean)/(ntrt - 1))
However, as Triquart et al. have argued, one should consider presenting the uncertainty around the point estimate above:
"SUCRA estimates are not currently presented with their uncertainty intervals. Because SUCRA is derived from the mean rank, the 95% CrI for mean rank should be translated into a 95% CrI for SUCRA"
Would it be possible to add this functionality to the multinma package?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: