-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rename config examples directory #2438
Rename config examples directory #2438
Conversation
Why the file mode changes ( |
Since there was a request to continue discussion here..
As stated, it was an improvement to our docs with the normalization effort for consistency. If you grep the docs, you'll find other directories beyond This provides a root data/volume directory with sub-folder for each container, thus related data, but still isolated by associated container. I use this approach for storing data with multi-container projects as littering the volume dirs one level higher in a project structure isn't helpful.
Like I replied above to casper, this is a structure I use and makes sense to me, and our docs to avoid any vagueness. I would assume that our users are familiar enough with Docker that if they did not like the Personally, I don't see much benefit in changing the paths used, especially since they are more useful in the current state for maintaining the docs vs before when paths were inconsistent or overlapping (containers from different images using same/similar paths like I'm open to it being handled better too. I just remember the state of the docs prior to normalization due to various contributors over time and this sort of thing slipping through where it was harder to correct. I'm not going to defend the current choice more than that. If maintainers disagree with the justification and think it's fine/better to simplify the path, that's all good too 👍 |
See the commit message associated to them:
|
Minor change, I don't wanted to open a separat PR. Now it's streamlined with |
Okay, I wasn't aware of that. I took only the 4 paths from Going back to the previous approach (just using But to avoid problems mentioned in #2436, the directory must be renamed. However, I am still not happy with the new long path. What about renaming the |
Redundant
That's only really an option with the It doesn't have to match the docs path, in fact it may be more clearer and less surprising if it's clearly Is there a benefit to implicitly using that folder when a user clones the repo and uses ..I should really read the full message before replying 😅
Yes that works just as well as |
As long as there are no other subdirectorys, I would like to keep it flat. What is better: |
Or if it's more of a single example rather |
There are various files in that directory. Plural is fine. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
Due to the file adjustments this PR has to wait until 10.5.0
is released.
See milestone 😉 |
Documentation preview for this PR is ready! 🎉 Built with commit: c183d40 |
Description
To align with the documentation, this PR relocates the
config
directory.See also discussion here.
Type of change
Checklist:
docs/
)