We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There's a rather serious regression in docopt 0.6.
The following program fails to parse a simple "fs fail --loglevel 5". Instead it prints the usage message:
#! /usr/bin/env python """ Usage: fs good [options] fs fail [options] Options: --loglevel=<level> loglevel """ import docopt print docopt.docopt(__doc__)
i.e. with docopt 0.6 I get
[dev] ~/ % ./fs good --loglevel 5 {'--loglevel': '5', 'fail': False, 'good': True} [dev] ~/ % ./fs fail --loglevel 5 Usage: fs good [options] fs fail [options]
Without the --loglevel parameter it's working:
[dev] ~/ % ./fs fail {'--loglevel': None, 'fail': True, 'good': False}
with 0.5 I get the expected results:
[dev] ~/ % ./fs good --loglevel 5 {'--loglevel': '5', 'fail': False, 'good': True} [dev] ~/ % ./fs fail --loglevel 5 {'--loglevel': '5', 'fail': True, 'good': False}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is now on PyPI: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/docopt
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
There's a rather serious regression in docopt 0.6.
The following program fails to parse a simple "fs fail --loglevel
5". Instead it prints the usage message:
i.e. with docopt 0.6 I get
Without the --loglevel parameter it's working:
with 0.5 I get the expected results:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: