Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nullptr issue. #110

Closed
iSLC opened this issue Dec 10, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Nullptr issue. #110

iSLC opened this issue Dec 10, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@iSLC
Copy link

iSLC commented Dec 10, 2017

Description

I was trying to test a string view default constructor and to see if the pointer was indeed null. Since I've assigned nullptr to it.

Steps to reproduce

#define DOCTEST_CONFIG_IMPLEMENT_WITH_MAIN
#include "doctest.h"

struct test
{
	const char * ptr;

	test() : ptr(nullptr) { }

	const char * get() const { return ptr; }
};

TEST_CASE("dummy")
{
    test o;
    FAST_REQUIRE_NE(o.get(), nullptr);
}

Output:

src\main.cpp(15)
TEST CASE:  dummy

src\main.cpp(19) FATAL ERROR!
  FAST_REQUIRE_NE( o.get(), nullptr )
with expansion:
  FAST_REQUIRE_NE( NULL, nullptr )

Am I required to use NULL instead of nullptr ? Because I would prefer the later.

Extra information

  • doctest version: v1.2.6
  • Operating System: Windows
  • Compiler+version: gcc version 7.2.0 (x86_64-posix-seh-rev0, Built by MinGW-W64 project)
@iSLC
Copy link
Author

iSLC commented Dec 10, 2017

Seems to work if i use CHECK(o.get() == nullptr); I guess I should use that instead. But still bothers me why the first approach failed.

@iSLC
Copy link
Author

iSLC commented Dec 10, 2017

Never mind. I was too focused on the error to notice my copy/paste mistake. As I was testing NE instead of EQ. My apologies.

@iSLC iSLC closed this as completed Dec 10, 2017
@onqtam
Copy link
Member

onqtam commented Dec 11, 2017

Glad you solved the issue :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants