Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Base your stack tracing / "symbolization" on Boost stack_trace #146

Open
eyalroz opened this issue Aug 24, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Base your stack tracing / "symbolization" on Boost stack_trace #146

eyalroz opened this issue Aug 24, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@eyalroz
Copy link

eyalroz commented Aug 24, 2018

The roadmap includes the following item:

  • symbolizer - for a stack trace - when an assertion fails - and it's in a user function with some deep callstack away from the current test case - how to know the exact code path that lead to the failing assert.

Facebook's folly is by now pretty old. Instead, you should base this work on Antony Polukhin's excellent and extensive work for the Boost Stack Trace library (now officially released as part of Boost, and with documentation, too).

@eyalroz eyalroz changed the title [For 2.3] Base your stack tracing / "symbolization" on Boost stack_trace [For v2.3] Base your stack tracing / "symbolization" on Boost stack_trace Aug 24, 2018
@onqtam
Copy link
Member

onqtam commented Aug 24, 2018

Good to know - I'll most likely use that!

@onqtam onqtam changed the title [For v2.3] Base your stack tracing / "symbolization" on Boost stack_trace Base your stack tracing / "symbolization" on Boost stack_trace Dec 1, 2018
@eyalroz
Copy link
Author

eyalroz commented Dec 8, 2021

I should mention that last year I created a de-boostified version of libstacktrace.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants