Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pkispawn of TPS is successful when CA's secure http port is assigned as TPS' unsecure http port #2119

Open
pki-bot opened this issue Oct 3, 2020 · 5 comments
Milestone

Comments

@pki-bot
Copy link

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

This issue was migrated from Pagure Issue #1560. Originally filed by rpattath (@rpattath) on 2015-08-13 23:50:30:


pkispawn of TPS is successful when CA's secure http port is assigned as TPS' unsecure http port

Steps to Reproduce:

1. pkispawn CA with secure http port 30042
2. pkispawn KRA and TKS
3. pkispawn TPS with 30042 as the unsecure http port

Actual results:

pkispawn is successful but unable to perform token format/enroll operations with the unsecure port

Expected results:

pkispawn should complain

Additional info:

Created attachment 1062736 in associated bug
TPS debug log
@pki-bot pki-bot added this to the FUTURE milestone Oct 3, 2020
@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from mharmsen (@mharmsen) at 2015-08-18 01:37:26

Per CS/DS Meeting of 08/17/2015 - 10.3

@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from mharmsen (@mharmsen) at 2016-05-06 22:14:30

Per Bug Triage of 05/05/2016: 10.4

NOTE: make this a self-test check.

@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from rpattath (@rpattath) at 2017-02-27 14:12:15

Metadata Update from @rpattath:

  • Issue set to the milestone: UNTRIAGED

@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from mharmsen (@mharmsen) at 2017-08-30 22:41:47

Metadata Update from @mharmsen:

  • Custom field feature adjusted to None
  • Custom field lowhangingfruit adjusted to vakwetu: X
  • Custom field proposedmilestone adjusted to None
  • Custom field proposedpriority adjusted to None
  • Custom field reviewer adjusted to None
  • Custom field version adjusted to None
  • Issue close_status updated to: None
  • Issue set to the milestone: FUTURE (was: UNTRIAGED)

@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from mharmsen (@mharmsen) at 2018-04-13 18:40:47

Per 10.5.x/10.6 Triage: FUTURE

mharmsen: problem occurs when a configuration issue is made; while it should be looked at, since the TPS instance configures but does not work it seems like a minor issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant