Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generate more obfuscated noise files during installation #2679

Open
pki-bot opened this issue Oct 3, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Generate more obfuscated noise files during installation #2679

pki-bot opened this issue Oct 3, 2020 · 4 comments
Milestone

Comments

@pki-bot
Copy link

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

This issue was migrated from Pagure Issue #2559. Originally filed by stlaz (@stlaz) on 2016-12-08 15:27:58:

  • Assigned to nobody

I noticed that during pkispawn a lot of noise files generated to work with certutil contain just the string "not_so_random_data". I do not think that "It's not used anyway" comment from the code justifies this behavior. It may not be used now but if there's a use to it in the future, it'd be hard to notice and would instantly cause a CVE to pop out.

I think that reading bytes from /dev/random should be cheap enough operation and should be used instead.

@pki-bot pki-bot added this to the FUTURE milestone Oct 3, 2020
@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from mharmsen (@mharmsen) at 2016-12-13 02:01:11

Per CS/DS Meeting of 12/12/2016: 10.4 - minor

REASON PROVIDED BY RRELYEA: A modern nss running on a modern box. NSS's own entropy, which uses dev urandom, is very good and using a bad noise file will be of little consequence at this point.

PROPOSED SOLUTION: Either remove noise file, or populate it with random data (use NSS method).

@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from stlaz (@stlaz) at 2017-02-27 14:05:43

Metadata Update from @stlaz:

  • Issue set to the milestone: 10.4

@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from mharmsen (@mharmsen) at 2017-08-09 16:52:37

Per CS/DS Meeting of August 7, 2017, it was determined to move this issue from 10.4 ==> FUTURE.

@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from mharmsen (@mharmsen) at 2017-08-09 16:52:37

Metadata Update from @mharmsen:

  • Custom field feature adjusted to None
  • Custom field proposedmilestone adjusted to None
  • Custom field proposedpriority adjusted to None
  • Custom field reviewer adjusted to None
  • Custom field version adjusted to None
  • Issue close_status updated to: None
  • Issue set to the milestone: FUTURE (was: 10.4)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant