Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CMC: provide Proof of Possession for encryption cert requests #2735

Closed
pki-bot opened this issue Oct 3, 2020 · 9 comments
Closed

CMC: provide Proof of Possession for encryption cert requests #2735

pki-bot opened this issue Oct 3, 2020 · 9 comments
Milestone

Comments

@pki-bot
Copy link

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

This issue was migrated from Pagure Issue #2615. Originally filed by mharmsen (@mharmsen) on 2017-03-20 12:04:42:


Dogtag currently does not provide any Proof of Possession mechanism for
encryption cert requests.

This task will require use of the id-cmc-encryptedPOP and id-cmc-decryptedPOP
to complete.

This task will depend on the availability of completed work for underlying JSS
ASN.1 code from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1337092.

@pki-bot pki-bot added this to the 10.4.1 milestone Oct 3, 2020
@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from mharmsen (@mharmsen) at 2017-03-20 12:04:43

Metadata Update from @mharmsen:

@pki-bot pki-bot closed this as completed Oct 3, 2020
@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from mharmsen (@mharmsen) at 2017-03-20 12:04:43

Metadata Update from @mharmsen:

@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from mharmsen (@mharmsen) at 2017-03-20 12:21:32

Metadata Update from @mharmsen:

  • Custom field component adjusted to General
  • Custom field feature adjusted to ''
  • Custom field origin adjusted to Community
  • Custom field proposedmilestone adjusted to ''
  • Custom field proposedpriority adjusted to ''
  • Custom field reviewer adjusted to ''
  • Custom field type adjusted to defect
  • Custom field version adjusted to ''
  • Issue priority set to: 2

@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from mharmsen (@mharmsen) at 2017-03-20 12:26:14

Metadata Update from @mharmsen:

  • Custom field component adjusted to CMC (was: General)
  • Custom field origin adjusted to RHCust (was: Community)
  • Custom field type adjusted to enhancement (was: defect)

@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from cfu (@cfu) at 2017-03-28 12:14:29

commit 58b0563
Author: Christina Fu cfu@redhat.com
Date: Fri Mar 10 19:50:13 2017 -0800

Bug 1419742: CMC RFE: provide Proof of Possession for encryption cert requests CMC encryptedPOP and decrypedPOP (Phase 1) also disable lraPOPwitness This patch implements the Proof of Possession for encryption only keys. This is a preliminary implementation with limitations. It does not support more than one request. ECC keys are untested. This version only uses default algorithms at some internal places. Not all limitations are listed here.

@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from cfu (@cfu) at 2017-03-28 12:15:44

commit 358064e
Author: Christina Fu cfu@redhat.com
Date: Sun Mar 26 17:34:51 2017 -0400

Bug 2615 CMC: cleanup code for Encrypted Decrypted POP This patch adds more error checking and debugging

@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from cfu (@cfu) at 2017-03-28 12:22:18

Metadata Update from @cfu:

  • Issue assigned to cfu
  • Issue close_status updated to: fixed
  • Issue status updated to: Closed (was: Open)

@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from mharmsen (@mharmsen) at 2017-03-28 12:23:56

Metadata Update from @mharmsen:

  • Issue set to the milestone: 10.4.1 (was: 10.4)

@pki-bot
Copy link
Author

pki-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Comment from mharmsen (@mharmsen) at 2017-03-31 17:30:35

Metadata Update from @mharmsen:

  • Custom field fixedinversion adjusted to pki-core-10.4.1-1.fc27

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant