Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Standardise Naming of has flags #5

Closed
kitsonk opened this issue Jul 27, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Standardise Naming of has flags #5

kitsonk opened this issue Jul 27, 2015 · 1 comment
Assignees
@pdfernhout
Labels
discussion
Milestone
2016.08

Comments

@kitsonk
Copy link
Member

kitsonk commented Jul 27, 2015

We should standardise has flag naming to be more expressive. The ideally should refer to the macro standard of which they were introduced in.

For example:

  • html5- for items that were introduced as part of HTML5
  • dom3- for items that were introduced as W3C DOM Level 3 Specification
  • es5- for items that were introduced as part of ECMAScript 5
  • es6- for items that were introduced as part of ECMAScript 6/2015
  • es7- for items that are likely to be ratified as part of ECMAScript 7 (e.g. Object.observe)
  • css3- for items that were introduced as part of CSS3
@kitsonk kitsonk mentioned this issue Jul 27, 2015
Closed
@kitsonk kitsonk mentioned this issue Mar 18, 2016
Closed
@kitsonk kitsonk added this to the 2016.05 milestone Apr 8, 2016
@kitsonk kitsonk modified the milestones: 2016.06, 2016.05 Jun 7, 2016
@kitsonk kitsonk modified the milestones: 2016.06, 2016.07 Jul 4, 2016
@kitsonk kitsonk modified the milestones: 2016.07, 2016.08 Aug 1, 2016
@kitsonk
Copy link
Member Author

kitsonk commented Sep 7, 2016

Issue moved to dojo/has #14 via ZenHub

@kitsonk kitsonk closed this as completed Sep 7, 2016
@kitsonk kitsonk mentioned this issue Sep 7, 2016
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@pdfernhout pdfernhout

Labels
discussion
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2016.08
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@pdfernhout @kitsonk