New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make old revisions easier to discover #2376
Comments
Good idea! This lack of information I noticed already too. I think a better concept could be "purged" not "deleted" or "does not exist". |
So far I know 'purge' means to remove thoroughly, while 'delete' means remove. The idea of the wiki is that is should not be completely thoroughly erase the page, without keeping it somewhere... . So does 'delete' not fit better for a page that is restorable? |
All what I "know" is what Leo writes: German translations: Leo:purge Leo remove Leo:delete So far I Leo understand: If something is purged it is empty from something (maybe thoroughly). What is the apperception of the user? I guess the page is for him, what he see on the screen. |
@Michaelsy maybe you're not the best person to give advice on English wording? Or to quote yourself: "auf Englisch zu schreiben ist für mich so [...] anstrengend und mühsam" |
Update: I agree. |
IMHO the header and the first sentence of the message make it very clear. Nothing to improve from my side. |
Of course this makes it very clear. |
When a page does not exist, we show the
newpage.txt
message. However when a page once existed, but then was deleted, we show the same message.Inspired by the discussions in #2370, I think it would make sense to explicitly tell users that the page they are looking for no longer exists.
Example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: