Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update implicit global usings feature #5409

Closed
RussKie opened this issue Aug 10, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5609
Closed

Update implicit global usings feature #5409

RussKie opened this issue Aug 10, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #5609

Comments

@RussKie
Copy link
Member

RussKie commented Aug 10, 2021

The original implementation of "implicit global usings" (dotnet/sdk#18459 and #5183) has been determined to be intrusive, and it needs to be reworked as "opt-in" instead "opt-out". The new implementation must match dotnet/sdk#19599

Refer to dotnet/sdk#19521 for more details.

@RussKie RussKie added ⛔ blocked Blocked by external dependencies Priority:1 Work that is critical for the release, but we could probably ship without labels Aug 10, 2021
@RussKie RussKie added this to the 6.0 milestone Aug 10, 2021
@RussKie RussKie added this to To do in .NET 6 templates use modern C# idioms via automation Aug 10, 2021
@RussKie RussKie moved this from To do to Blocked in .NET 6 templates use modern C# idioms Aug 10, 2021
@dreddy-work dreddy-work modified the milestones: 6.0, 6.0 rc2 Aug 20, 2021
@RussKie RussKie removed ⛔ blocked Blocked by external dependencies Priority:1 Work that is critical for the release, but we could probably ship without labels Sep 5, 2021
@RussKie RussKie removed this from the 6.0 rc2 milestone Sep 5, 2021
@RussKie RussKie closed this as completed Sep 5, 2021
.NET 6 templates use modern C# idioms automation moved this from Blocked to Done Sep 5, 2021
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 27, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants