We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Since 2001. https://sigmodrecord.org/publications/sigmodRecord/0606/p29-inv-article-madden.pdf "Starting with the 2001 SIGMOD conference, the SIGMOD Chair, in consultation with the SIGMOD Advisory Committee, imposed a double blind rule on all future SIGMOD conferences."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While SIGMOD is double blind, VLDB is not. From http://vldb.org/pvldb/vol15-submission/:
VLDB is a single-blind conference. Therefore, authors MUST include their names and affiliations on the first page of the manuscript.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Thanks, will update!
Great, thanks. Note that the "Historical notes" also needs updating, it still says "SIGMOD and VLDB have been double-blind..."
Fixed discussion of VLDB (still single-blind)
376e467
No branches or pull requests
Since 2001.
https://sigmodrecord.org/publications/sigmodRecord/0606/p29-inv-article-madden.pdf
"Starting with the 2001 SIGMOD conference, the
SIGMOD Chair, in consultation with the SIGMOD
Advisory Committee, imposed a double blind rule on
all future SIGMOD conferences."
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: