You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
status NEW severity minor in component general for ---
Reported in version 1.5.6 on platform Other
Assigned to: Dimitri van Heesch
On 2009-03-30 20:26:56 +0000, Adam H Peterson wrote:
Please describe the problem:
When using Doxygen to document the class hierarchy below and to produce an
inheritance diagram, the diagram mistakenly labels B as a private base of C
(although it is a public base):
struct A { };
struct B { };
struct C : A, B { };
Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a .cpp file with the above three struct definitions.
2. Configure Doxygen to produce an inheritance diagram with Dot.
3. Generate documentation.
Actual results:
The inheritance diagram shows C publicly inheriting from A (correct), and
privately inheriting from B (incorrect).`
Expected results:
C should be shown to publicly inherit from both bases.
Does this happen every time?
Yes
Other information:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
With the 1.5.6 version we see the wrong inheritance as explained in the the issue.
With the 1.9.1 version the both inheritance are public inheritances.
I think the problem has been solved in the mean time.
status NEW severity minor in component general for ---
Reported in version 1.5.6 on platform Other
Assigned to: Dimitri van Heesch
On 2009-03-30 20:26:56 +0000, Adam H Peterson wrote:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: