Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trailing comments not rendered properly if MARKDOWN_SUPPORT enabled (Origin: bugzilla #699437) #5158

Closed
doxygen opened this issue Jul 2, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@doxygen
Copy link
Owner

doxygen commented Jul 2, 2018

status RESOLVED severity normal in component general for ---
Reported in version 1.8.3.1 on platform Other
Assigned to: Dimitri van Heesch

On 2013-05-02 05:15:32 +0000, David Haney wrote:

This issue was originally reported on Stack Overflow (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16326563/doxygen-documentation-after-members-malfunction-cause-formatting-as-code-fragm)

The following code is not rendered correctly with Doxygen 1.8.3.1 (it was with Doxygen 1.8.2):

/** Test struct definition */
typedef struct
{
int member_1; /< Single-line detailed description */
int member_2; /
< Multi-line detailed description. Blah
blah blah */
} TEST_S;

The first line of member_2's description is documented as a code fragment. If MARKDOWN_SUPPORT is disabled, moved to the following line, or moved before member_2 (and switched to a leading doxygen comment), the documentation is rendered correctly.

On 2013-05-11 20:48:35 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:

Confirmed. Should be fixed in the next subversion update.

On 2013-05-19 12:35:49 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:

This bug was previously marked ASSIGNED, which means it should be fixed in
doxygen version 1.8.4. Please verify if this is indeed the case. Reopen the
bug if you think it is not fixed and please include any additional information
that you think can be relevant.

@doxygen doxygen closed this as completed Jul 2, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant