You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Doxygen 1.8.1.2 generate correct "collaboration diagram" - see attachment OK__structAAA_1_1BB__coll__graph.png.
Doxygen 1.8.6 generate wrong "collaboration diagram" l1 on diagram is AAA::AAA::BB type and not reference to BB struct - see attachment BAD__structAAA_1_1BB__coll__graph.png.
Problem is probably in normalizeNonTemplateArgumentsInString() function, or in used by it getResolvedClass() function.
Using
result+=cd->localName();
instead
result+=cd->name()
in normalizeNonTemplateArgumentsInString() function fix this issue, but don't resolve short name to full scope name (I don't know if it's a problem for other functionality of doxygen).
On 2014-05-10 15:23:16 +0000, Robert Paciorek wrote:
Created attachment 276284
example of correct collaboration diagram
On 2016-05-11 20:37:32 +0000, Robert Paciorek wrote:
Created attachment 327662
proposed patch
Patch for current git version.
Add colon to regexp, because in scoped type name is integral part of type name and there's no need cut template class name on colons.
On 2016-10-17 19:56:57 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
Thanks, I'll include the patch in the next GIT update.
On 2016-12-29 18:45:47 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
This bug was previously marked ASSIGNED, which means it should be fixed in
doxygen version 1.8.13. Please verify if this is indeed the case. Reopen the
bug if you think it is not fixed and please include any additional information
that you think can be relevant (preferably in the form of a self-contained example).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
status RESOLVED severity normal in component general for ---
Reported in version 1.8.7 on platform Other
Assigned to: Dimitri van Heesch
Original attachment names and IDs:
On 2014-05-10 15:22:20 +0000, Robert Paciorek wrote:
On 2014-05-10 15:23:16 +0000, Robert Paciorek wrote:
On 2016-05-11 20:37:32 +0000, Robert Paciorek wrote:
On 2016-10-17 19:56:57 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
On 2016-12-29 18:45:47 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: