RTF output has incomplete "References" and "Referenced by" sections (Origin: bugzilla #755783)

[doxygen]

status VERIFIED severity normal in component general for ---
Reported in version 1.8.10 on platform Other
Assigned to: Dimitri van Heesch

Original attachment names and IDs:

• omitted_references.zip (ID 312354)

On 2015-09-29 10:29:29 +0000, Ingolf Steinbach wrote:

Created attachment 312354
Small example exhibiting the problem

When generating RTF output with doxygen 1.8.10 (Kubuntu 12.04.05, x86_64), the resulting refman.rtf does not show the "References" and "Referenced by" sections correctly: it contains these headings and also separators like comma but the actual names of the functions are omitted.

The RTF output of the attached example contains

void trunk (void )

This is somewhere in the middle.
Definition at line 3 of file trunk.c.
References , and .
Referenced by .

The HTML output generated from the same input files shows the two sections correctly:

void trunk ( void )

This is somewhere in the middle.

Definition at line 3 of file trunk.c.

References leaf1(), and leaf2().

Referenced by root().

The documentation for all of leaf1(), leaf2(), and root() is contained in the refman.rtf document -- together with anchors for the hyperlinks; however their function names are omitted in the "References"/"Referenced by" section in the RTF documentation of trunk().

This bug seems to be different from bug 133515, bug 318002, bug 319998, bug 373646, and bug 629249.

On 2015-09-30 16:22:38 +0000, albert wrote:

I've just pushed a proposed solution to github (pull request 400)

On 2015-10-04 14:23:17 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:

Thanks, I've merged the pull request

On 2015-12-30 10:19:06 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:

This bug was previously marked ASSIGNED, which means it should be fixed in
doxygen version 1.8.11. Please verify if this is indeed the case. Reopen the
bug if you think it is not fixed and please include any additional information
that you think can be relevant (preferably in the form of a self-contained example).

On 2016-01-04 15:47:22 +0000, Ingolf Steinbach wrote:

I confirm that the issue is fixed in version 1.8.11. Thanks a lot.
(Please revert the Status from VERIFIED in case it is not in my responsibility to change it.)