You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Preface
Let's imagine we have an interface A and a class B, where B implements A.
public interface A {
/**
* Cool description.
*/
void method(int parameter);
}
public class B implements A { @OverRide
public void method(final int parameter) {
}
}
The problem
In case 'finality' of parameters in the class doesn't match exactly 'finality' of parameters in the interface (in other words the class B marks some parameters final while the interface A doesn't or vice-versa) the class B won't inherit the docs from the interface A.
Expected result
'final' keyword used on parameters doesn't affect inheritance as it's not a part of method signature.
The class B should inherit the docs from the interface A even if there is a difference in 'finality' of parameters.
Attached:
doxygen-final.zip -- cnfig and source files that shows the problem
On 2016-04-14 20:09:52 +0000, Misha wrote:
Created attachment 326052
doxygen-final.zip
On 2016-05-07 18:00:07 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
Confirmed. Should be fixed in the next GIT update.
On 2016-09-05 13:46:20 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
This bug was previously marked ASSIGNED, which means it should be fixed in
doxygen version 1.8.12. Please verify if this is indeed the case. Reopen the
bug if you think it is not fixed and please include any additional information
that you think can be relevant (preferably in the form of a self-contained example).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
status RESOLVED severity normal in component general for ---
Reported in version 1.8.11 on platform Other
Assigned to: Dimitri van Heesch
Original attachment names and IDs:
On 2016-04-14 20:07:16 +0000, Misha wrote:
On 2016-04-14 20:09:52 +0000, Misha wrote:
On 2016-05-07 18:00:07 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
On 2016-09-05 13:46:20 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: