You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #990 we spottet an issue with how game types are layed out currently. The way we present the options and combinations is limited and doesn't allow for further game implementations.
For now, Decadent got added to our second row of options as decadent sealed is a corner case. But with the already opened PR regarding glimpse draft (#1021) things get tricky.
But it looks like we basically found an agreement about adding a new layer for flexibility and all future possibilities to the game selection matrix already:
@ZeldaZach:
I like tom's idea of a 3rd category, although it might add some excessive button clicks to the program.
Hmm. Can you elaborate further?
The Regular variants would always be preselected of course. So no additional clicks for creating a standard draft or sealed game room. In case one wants to play with a different card pool, that also doesn't involve more clicks as in the current implementation.
With new game modes and variations of Game, Pool and Pick type a lot of combinations are possible which is great. Therefore having "pre-configured options" that combine a combination of pool type and pick type and offer it as "Decadent Draft", "Glimpse Draft", "Rochester Draft" and so on would result in many more buttons and a bad interface.
@serokellcao:
Re — unnecessary cicks, I'd just have a text field w/ autocomplete as an
alternative input.
I'm not sure if I got you 100% right. How can a text field help with the needed "clicks" (consider the button hits to type)? Having a drop down menu is also not ideal IMO...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In #990 we spottet an issue with how game types are layed out currently. The way we present the options and combinations is limited and doesn't allow for further game implementations.
For now,
Decadent
got added to our second row of options as decadent sealed is a corner case. But with the already opened PR regarding glimpse draft (#1021) things get tricky.But it looks like we basically found an agreement about adding a new layer for flexibility and all future possibilities to the game selection matrix already:
-->
Game
,Pool/Cards
andPick
type:Only @HerveH44 didn't say what he things about it yet. :)
(Linking @keeler)
Mentioned concerns so far:
Hmm. Can you elaborate further?
The
Regular
variants would always be preselected of course. So no additional clicks for creating a standard draft or sealed game room. In case one wants to play with a different card pool, that also doesn't involve more clicks as in the current implementation.With new game modes and variations of Game, Pool and Pick type a lot of combinations are possible which is great. Therefore having "pre-configured options" that combine a combination of pool type and pick type and offer it as "Decadent Draft", "Glimpse Draft", "Rochester Draft" and so on would result in many more buttons and a bad interface.
I'm not sure if I got you 100% right. How can a text field help with the needed "clicks" (consider the button hits to type)? Having a drop down menu is also not ideal IMO...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: