Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

alternative parts list #1

Closed
sp4rkie opened this issue Mar 7, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed

alternative parts list #1

sp4rkie opened this issue Mar 7, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@sp4rkie
Copy link

sp4rkie commented Mar 7, 2020

nice description!

2 years ago I setup such a machine with following parts list. MikroTik WLAN cards are superior since running Atheros chipsets. Feel free to include parts in your documentation.

1 x PC Engines apu2d4
1 x PC Engines case1d2blku
1 x PC Engines ac12veur2
1 x mSATA mini PCIE 8gb
1 x MikroTik R11E-2HPnD, miniPCI-e card
1 x MikroTik R11E-5HACD, miniPCI-e card
4 x Delock 88395 WLAN 802.11 ac/a/b/g/n 2 dBi
4 x RP-SMA Jack Pigtail to MMCX (18cm)

seller I bought everything from: varia-store.com

IMG_20180912_125714

@drduh drduh closed this as completed in f89cbb2 Mar 22, 2020
@kucharskim
Copy link

@sp4rkie, am I right, that official case case1d2blku has only 2 holes for antennas and I see here that you have 4 antennas? Did you drill 2 additional mounting points for the antennas on the other side?

@sp4rkie
Copy link
Author

sp4rkie commented Aug 19, 2020

correct! The original case has only 2 holes. When drilling the 2 additional holes take care to keep enough space between the board and the mounted antennae.

@drduh
Copy link
Owner

drduh commented Oct 16, 2023

@sp4rkie how is the wireless performance holding up with those cards, and on what OS?

@sp4rkie
Copy link
Author

sp4rkie commented Oct 16, 2023

the performance is good in my opinion. I still use 3 of these access points (exactly as shown in the picture above) distributed in my apartment.

performance test running between accesspoint and laptop (3m distance):

accesspoint hardware: APU with R11E-5HACD (name 'gwy')
accesspoint os: debian_version 10.13

laptop hardware: Thinkpad X1 Carbon (name 'why')
laptop os: debian_version 11.8

  1. test

     nc -l 8000 > /dev/zero      # server started on 'why'
     nc why 8000 < /dev/zero     # client started on 'gwy' against 'why'
     iftop -B                    # started on 'why'
    
                       2.33GB             4.66GB            6.98GB             9.31GB       11.6GB
     └─────────────────┴──────────────────┴─────────────────┴──────────────────┴──────────────────
     why                             <=> gwy                               45.3MB  41.9MB  39.0MB
    
     ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
     TX:             cum:   1.07MB   peak:   51.6KB               rates:   39.8KB  39.2KB  36.5KB
     RX:                    1.14GB           51.7MB                        45.2MB  41.9MB  39.0MB
     TOTAL:                 1.14GB           51.7MB                        45.3MB  41.9MB  39.0MB
    
  2. test (opposite direction)

     nc -l 8000 < /dev/zero      # server started on 'why'
     nc why 8000 > /dev/zero     # client started on 'gwy' against 'why'
     iftop -B                    # started on 'why'
    
                       2.33GB             4.66GB            6.98GB             9.31GB       11.6GB
     └─────────────────┴──────────────────┴─────────────────┴──────────────────┴──────────────────
     why                             <=> gwy                               42.0MB  41.4MB  38.4MB
    
     ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
     TX:             cum:    536MB   peak:   43.0MB               rates:   41.9MB  41.3MB  38.3MB
     RX:                    1.09MB           91.2KB                        87.2KB  85.7KB  79.6KB
     TOTAL:                  537MB           43.1MB                        42.0MB  41.4MB  38.4MB
    

if you want me to test something special I could do that for you

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants