Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Auto-suggest related resources through named entity recognition (NER) #46

Closed
Driebot opened this issue May 18, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Comments

@Driebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Driebot commented May 18, 2016

In gitlab by david on Mar 21, 2016, 17:23

In admin, parse resource body text and recognise keywords in Ginger. Then based on those resources, automatically suggest related resources. Content editors can then accept/reject the suggestions. When they accept, create an outgoing edge to the selected resource(s).

For parsing the text:

Also needs some UI work where editors can accept/reject suggestions.

/cc @emine @fred

@ddeboer ddeboer changed the title Auto-suggest related resources Auto-suggest related resources through named entity recognition (NER) Jun 15, 2016
@ddeboer
Copy link
Member

ddeboer commented Jun 15, 2016

Can https://research.googleblog.com/2016/05/announcing-syntaxnet-worlds-most.html help? Seems to be about language understanding (syntax/grammar) rather than simply extracting entities.

@Dirklectisch
Copy link
Contributor

You are certainly right that it is more advanced than just ripping out the entities. But it can also just filter nouns, verbs or whatever you want (if I understand that blog post correctly).

@fredpook
Copy link

DBpedia spotlight already filters "noise" since the entities come from crowd-sourced wikipedia pages.

@ddeboer
Copy link
Member

ddeboer commented May 24, 2018

We now have a DBpedia Spotlight module for extracting DBpedia resources from text.

@ddeboer ddeboer closed this as completed May 24, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants