Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the output is strange after training on my own dataset #7

Closed
milk-bottle-liyu opened this issue Nov 24, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

the output is strange after training on my own dataset #7

milk-bottle-liyu opened this issue Nov 24, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@milk-bottle-liyu
Copy link

Hi,friend, it's me again. <_>
I use my own data to train my network. Because I only recorded the steer angle, so I modified it to output only one float, the steer angle. However something strange happened. The mean loss in training stage stays high. Then I check the output on the val dataset and find the values are all positive. Though my dataset is not as big as yours, it still contains thousands samples from 4 scenes. Some of my outputs are in the picture. I tried to normalized the data, but it did not work. What should I do to solve the problem?
image

@wangjksjtu
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, it is pretty strange. There must be some bugs while transplanting to your dataset. I could not ensure the problems with the information provided. Have you modified the loss by the way or adjust the hyper-parameters? Will the training loss decrease in the training?

@milk-bottle-liyu
Copy link
Author

Sorry for not responding in time. I don`t understand why should I change the loss? For now I am working on the image only model, and besides IO I did not change any other things. The loss only drops in the first epoch and did not decrease over dozens epochs. The loss is like:
image

What can I do to make the loss decrease? I had doubled the train set already.

@milk-bottle-liyu
Copy link
Author

Also I change the lr decrease steps, so the lr is normal, I think. I also tried to use the pre-trained res-151 model to initialize the network but it turned out to be the same.

@wangjksjtu
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, I still don't know the causes from your description :(
It is hard to diagnose from the experience without the code and data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants