Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Study Week 2 - Chenxin #48

Closed
chenxin-chex opened this issue May 3, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Study Week 2 - Chenxin #48

chenxin-chex opened this issue May 3, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Projects

Comments

@chenxin-chex
Copy link
Collaborator

chenxin-chex commented May 3, 2022

Score: 4.5/5, Graded By: Akhil

Graded Kaavya: Kaavya's ticket

  • [-/1] MCQ results: 32/40
    image
  • [-/1] MCQ corrections
  • [-/1] FRQ code screenshots on github pages and running on Replit
  • [-/1] Daily participation (have attended class everday last week)
  • [-/.5] Quality of work
@chenxin-chex chenxin-chex self-assigned this May 3, 2022
@chenxin-chex chenxin-chex added this to To do/Backlog in Scrum Board via automation May 3, 2022
@chenxin-chex chenxin-chex moved this from To do/Backlog to Review Ready (for teacher) in Scrum Board May 3, 2022
@algolg
Copy link

algolg commented May 3, 2022

Score: 4.5/5
Graded By: Akhil

  • (1/1) MCQ results are given with a score well over 50%
  • (1/1) Written FRQ answers are on GitHub pages and code seems to be correct. Everything is very neat. One thing to watch out for is that we might be required to use pen on the AP exam.
  • (1/1) MCQ corrections are detailed and give good explanations for the correct answers. FRQs are deployed on Replit but it's hard to tell which part of the printed output belongs to each FRQ, so I would recommend adding details in the main method of the Main class.
  • (1/1) Participated daily last week and had a main role in ASI project
  • (0.5/5) High quality of work as shown by the detail put into MCQ corrections and FRQs

Glows: Everything is complete and very thorough. FRQ solutions look correct on paper and MCQ scores are good given the 60 minute time limit.

Grows: While code works on Replit, I would recommend that you make the printed output more detailed or even add input. I also believe that it would be best of MCQ corrections were put on GitHub Pages rather than a Google Doc, but everything is complete so I wouldn't dock points for that.

@chenxin-chex chenxin-chex moved this from Review Ready (for teacher) to Done (Reviewer approved) in Scrum Board May 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Scrum Board
Done (Reviewer approved)
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants