Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate babel instead of buble #11

Closed
DSchau opened this issue Aug 31, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Integrate babel instead of buble #11

DSchau opened this issue Aug 31, 2017 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@DSchau
Copy link
Owner

DSchau commented Aug 31, 2017

I liked using buble instead of babel for the ease of use/payload, however, some css-in-js libs (e.g. emotion) are only made possible with a babel plugin. Others still like glamor and styled-components receive significant improvements by opting in with the plugin, so... could be worth doing

@DSchau DSchau self-assigned this Aug 31, 2017
@DSchau DSchau changed the title [RESEARCH]: Integrate babel instead of buble Integrate babel instead of buble Aug 31, 2017
DSchau added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 8, 2017
@DSchau
Copy link
Owner Author

DSchau commented Sep 26, 2017

Now that Emotion no longer requires the babel plugin (emotion v8.0.0), this is less of a concern for me.

As such, I prefer buble's reduced file size.

@DSchau DSchau closed this as completed Sep 26, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant