Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

retaining goodness for backup routes #5

Open
dtaht opened this issue Oct 3, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

retaining goodness for backup routes #5

dtaht opened this issue Oct 3, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@dtaht
Copy link
Owner

dtaht commented Oct 3, 2018

I have a backup default route with a high metric. Keeping that route around would probably be useful.

Going through each speaker and determining the number of routes that I'm installing from it as a measure
of goodness, and keeping it's less good routes available in case the default route goes down might be a way to get there.

@dtaht dtaht changed the title retaining goodness retaining goodness for backup routes Oct 3, 2018
This was referenced Oct 3, 2018
@dtaht
Copy link
Owner Author

dtaht commented Oct 7, 2018

What I observed:

gw1 ----------------------------gw2
            |            |            |
           ogw1 .  ogw2 .  ogw3

gw1: 440 metric
gw2: 96 metric
ogw1,2,3 reannounce they can get somewhere with 192 metric

gw2 withdraws that route
1,2,3 pick up each others metric and retract but also go unreach

gw1 ultimately wins after the carnage is complete

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant