Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

role of orientation net #9

Closed
IQ17 opened this issue Aug 9, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

role of orientation net #9

IQ17 opened this issue Aug 9, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@IQ17
Copy link

IQ17 commented Aug 9, 2018

Hi thanks for the repo!

I would like to ask is that specially use a OriNet to rotate the patch, and then extract descriptor from the rotated patch necessary? I think most of descriptors are, at least claimed to be, rotation invariant.

descriptor(rotate(raw_patch)) and descriptor(raw_patch), are they really differ much?

@ducha-aiki
Copy link
Owner

ducha-aiki commented Aug 9, 2018

So far, I am not aware of any practically good "rotationally invariant descriptors". What is true, that if you rotate patch to small angle, like 5..may be 10 degrees, you would be able to match them. If more - no way.

Yes, descriptor(rotate(raw_patch)) and descriptor(raw_patch) really differ A LOT. You can check yourself, e.g. on this image sequence: http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/~vgg/research/affine/det_eval_files/boat.tar.gz

@IQ17
Copy link
Author

IQ17 commented Aug 11, 2018

Hi, I think your paper can be understood as a decoupled spatial transformer network (when STN uses affine matrix), but the way you do affine shape parametrization is much more precise and may lead to higher accuracy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants