Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Are there any test cases involving read_csv_auto(...., columns={....? #2305

Closed
travis-leith opened this issue Sep 20, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed
Labels

Comments

@travis-leith
Copy link
Contributor

I can't find any, but maybe I am looking in the wrong place.

@Mytherin
Copy link
Collaborator

I believe there are none, but COPY tbl FROM 'test.csv' will do something similar since the columns will be fixed to the columns as specified in the catalog definition of tbl. May I ask why you are looking for these particular test cases? Any issues you are encountering here?

@travis-leith
Copy link
Contributor Author

I was originally looking to see how headers=False is handled.
I now know the columns are assigned names as column0, column1, .....
In the process I noticed that there are no test cases covering the manual mapping of columns functionality.
I can probably submit a PR that adds a few this weekend if desired?

@Mytherin
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, that would be great! More test cases are always welcome.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 2, 2023

This issue is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 30 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Aug 2, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 2, 2023

This issue was closed because it has been stale for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Sep 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants